Another "cheat blog"

Interesting article in "Smart Politics" today about Minnesotans and the "liberal" i.d.

From the article:

The 2.62 to 1 ratio of conservatives to liberals is the highest recorded by SurveyUSA in Minnesota since it began semi-regular monthly tracking of the issue in June 2005 - besting the 2.43 to 1 ratio in July 2005.

(No other polling firm has surveyed Minnesotans more than SurveyUSA during this five-year span).

In only eight of the previous 66 polls have conservatives outnumbered liberals by at least a 2:1 ratio.

In early March of this year, three weeks before the passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, only 27 percent of Minnesotans identified as conservatives, with 15 percent as liberals, for a ratio of 1.80 to 1.

Forty-seven percent of Gopher State residents identified themselves as politically moderate in both the March and May SurveyUSA polls with the number of undecideds decreasing from 11 to 6 percent.

To be sure, over the past year there has been a concerted effort by critics of the Barack Obama administration and Democrats in Congress to equate what many see as a liberal agenda coming out of Washington D.C. as 'socialism.'

While it may take a bold individual to identify as a liberal these days, only the brazen freely call themselves 'socialist.' Political discourse that blurs the line between the two political ideologies has perhaps contributed to making an already unpopular political ideology even less attractive.

Ah- the Minn-Mods.  The Minnesota Moderate pickle in the middle who just wants to vote for the winner, who has no political viewpoint other than "I'm independent" which means absolutely nothing.  These are the folks who say "Tom Emmer looks angry" regurgitating the Star Tribune's positioning.  To which I always say, "Uh-huh, okay, um, what do you think about him on the issues?"  Crickets.

These are the same folks who say "Michelle Bachmann is crazy."  They only say what they think they should say in order to be accepted by the larger group.  In other words, they're FOLLOWERS and followers will follow ANY strong leader regardless of their ideology.  These are the folks who probably voted for Barack Obama and then quickly took the bumper sticker off their car when they realized he wasn't popular anymore.  The GOP is going to have to win enough of these folks over to win in November.  The numbers look good to do this right now, but these people don't make up their minds until about two weeks before the election so it's still anyone's game.

Then the liberals, poor liberals.  It's always been lame to be liberal.  Even Paul Wellstone couldn't make it "cool."  But hey, I can at least sort of respect liberals.  I like a point-of-view.  I just hate what they're doing to the country.

 

 

 

A stolen post (too busy to blog!) from Elmer Beauregard at Minnesotans for Global Warming.

Dim lights


The Los Angeles Times reported last week that Al and Tipper Gore greatly expanded their carbon footprint with the purchase of their fourth luxury home. The 'global warming' business has been very, very good to the Gores.

Former Vice President Al Gore and his wife, Tipper, have added a Montecito-area property to their real estate holdings, reports the Montecito Journal... The couple spent $8,875,000 on an ocean-view villa on 1.5 acres with a swimming pool, spa and fountains, a real estate source familiar with the deal confirms. The Italian-style house has six fireplaces, five bedrooms and nine bathrooms.


Given the ocean-view, Gore really can't be too concerned with rising sea levels

BTW If you look closely at the lamps in the lighting fixtures they ALL appear to be incandescents!

Thanks to prisoner6

Minnesota Progressive Project took my local Republican Party TO TASK and called them RACISTS for the following poll question that was up on their website last week: 

President Obama called the new Arizona bill banning illegal immigration "misguided".  Do you agree?
Sí, señor! 22% 
No Way, José! 77

I blogged about it with "When in Doubt, Call them Racists."

Politics in Minnesota picked up the story with their "Best of the Blogs".  The local party pulled the poll down immediately to quiet the furor of the left.  One of our local politicians issued a heartfelt apology for the "regrettable language."  Another received a total of THREE emails asking them to distance themselves from the RACISTS in their local party.  There was rabid condemnation for the "entirely inappropriate" poll.

Now President Obama, at the White House Correspondents' Association Dinne on Saturday night, said this:

"We all know what happens in Arizona when you don't have an ID. . . . Adios amigos."

President Obama is a RACIST too I guess!  I mean, you CAN'T say "Adios Amigos" in regards to Immigration because that is RACIST!

I might point out that Joe Bodell of Minnesota Progressive Project in his ended his last diatribe about the RACISTS of the Senate District 42 Republican Party by asking if it was time to "call a spade a spade", which some (not me- I use it all of the time) consider an off-color statement in itself. 

President Obama, of course, was simply using the phrase "Adios Amigos" to be funny.  Humor is NOT allowed in silly internet polls about Illegal Immigration, it IS allowed if you're wearing a tux and addressing the elites in the media while referring to Illegal Immigration.  You are NOT allowed to make light of serious issues if you are a Republican.  You ARE allowed to make fun of serious issues if you're a Democrat because you're all better than us and so much more enlightened and smart and such.  And because you can read the mind of Republicans and we're all awful people.  Right.  Gotcha. 

Hyper-Politically-Correct Liberals make me laugh. 

 

Here's just a sampling of the Star Tribune's coverage of Tom Emmer over the last few days:

Start with Pat Doyle's article on Tom Emmer today.  Doyle starts by calling Emmer a "conservative firebrand" and ends by saying "Emmer's record of drunken driving arrests 20 and 30 years ago has been cited by gubernatorial opponent Marty Seifert."  Nice.

Contrast that with the Rachel Stassen-Berger's pre-convention profile of Margaret Anderson Kelliher last week.  Notice even a hint of the bias?  A whiff?  Let's be clear:  Anderson Kelliher is as liberal as Emmer is conservative, the Star Tribune just doesn't want you to know that.  They do want you to know she's from a farm and that she's a woman.  (The word woman or women is mentioned EIGHT TIMES in the piece.)

Isn't it funny that the same writer can do a profile on Emmer's brilliant LG pick, Annette Meeks, and only mention the word "women" once (in reference to another potential LG candidate that is NOT Annette Meeks.)  Funny and obvious. 

You also have to love the way the Strib interprets Meek's heavyweight resume (by putting intention in Tom Emmer's statement): "She hasn't just talked about it," Emmer bragged. "She's written the book."  Bragged?  Bragged?  Geez, Strib mind-read much?

Oh and here's the pic they used for Margaret in her warm fuzzy profie:

alt

Here's Tom's picture:

alt

 

Then tonight the Strib purposely misquoted Tom Emmer with a headline that reads:

alt

 

 

At least the Pi Press has some integrity left:

alt

Same AP article, very different headline.

None of this is a surprise and it would be funny if there weren't about 9,000 people in Minnesota who still viewed the Star Tribune as a legitimate news source .  The left in Minnesota (which includes the Star Tribune,) is afraid of Tom Emmer and they will do everything to hide how far left Anderson Kelliher is.  (She wants Cascade banned for Pete's sake!)  They will not research her, they will not try to dig up anything on her, they will not do much other than listen to her homey spin, eat it up and spit it out.   (Sound familiar?)

If this isn't enough to convince delegates of the MNGOP why they should make Tom Emmer our nominee this Friday, I don't know what is...

I'm a free-market gal and not a huge believer in boycotts, (although I did successfully stay away from The Gap and it's subsidiaries through the holiday season.) 

But, in order to bring some attention to- what must be- the stupidest boycott I've ever heard of-I'm going to boycott St. Paul.  Well technically I can't totally boycott St. Paul because I go the Capitol for conservative causes....and my tax money goes there via the redistribution of wealth known as Local Government Aid.  Hmm...

I put in a call to the contact listed on the press release from Mayor Chris Coleman's Office, Bob Hume.  He wasn't available on either his office number or cell phone, so I sent an email at 2:15pm with this question:

I'd like to know- how much has the City of St. Paul spent on sending public employees to Arizona in the past 5 years?  I want to understand what triggered the boycott.  An estimate is fine.

I'll look forward to the response.  If it's a significant sum, then my question is:  "Why are City of St. Paul employees getting to go play in the sun on our tax dime?"   If it's not a large amount of money then my question is: "Why are you proposing a boycott of a place where the City hasn't spent any money?"

Now I do spend a bit of money in St. Paul-- I love St. Paul.  It's still a liberal hot mess, but you get far fewer evil glares than you do in Minneapolis when parallel parking your SUV.  Admittedly my boycott will have no measurable impact, but I have a funny feeling neither will Mayor Coleman's.

So until the Mayor gets a clue, I'm officially boycotting (for the rest of 2010) some of my favorite St. Paul haunts which include:

I'm a friendly boy-cotter though and provide links to promote these businesses. With the exception of the Lex and The St Paul Hotel, moving out to the 'burbs could be a good move!

P.S. One of my VERY FAVORITE candidates in Minnesota is Tony Hernandez, State Senate District 64, St. Paul.  I look forward to Tony refining his position on illegal immigration and what can be done to enforce the laws we have and solve the problem that so many politicians have simply ignored.